About your Search

20091101
20091130
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
to is the katie couric interviewed. as i write in my book, that was a bad interview. sarah palin admits it to this day. but that was only one interview. sarah palin gave many others. if you look at those other ones, you might have a very different opinion. host: next caller, good morning. caller: i like her because she is honest. during a conference about this administration, who boxes of their questions in the ways that they want it to be read. sarah palin gives interviews from the heart, but obama has surrounded himself with communist czars. she would take a good cabinet, but people want to hear. obama has to read the teleprompter. that is the sad part. host: are you going to see a lot more interviews as opposed to these and direct to voter affairs? guest: we are seeing the big- name interviews this week with the book rollout. i think that those are meant to humanize her, say that she is not a caricature. but i do not know what is going happen. i would say that if she is serious about continuing to be a national political figure, she will have to return to those more serious interview
that her real major misstep was her interview with katie couric. even sarah palin admits that it did not go well. she admitted that to oprah winfrey and talks about it in the book. every aspirant to high office should be it able to answer tough questions. what happened with sarah palin was a cultural revulsion. any rumored to be inherited, every fact that might confirm this caricature of her as some sort of radical conservative bent on taking us back to the stone age was embraced. every factor that contradicted that, which is most of her political profile prior to 2008, directly rebuffs that khartoum. well, those facts were dismissed. host: caller? caller: it seems to me that everything you just said, she seems to have this mentality, as many like her do, that any type of questioning or the slightest bit of negativity is right away and attack. i have not read the book, obviously, it has not come out yet, i am looking forward to it, but from what i have heard a great deal of it is about the left-wing media being out to get her. guest: well, there is something to the fact that people are out
insurance for the very first time. americans like katie gibson, a cancer survivor from bozeman, montana who shared her story with me this summer. because of a medical condition, katie's insurance policy was suddenly revoked when she needed it the most even though she was paying her premiums. i called katie this morning and i told her that when the bill that passed last night becomes law, we'll be able to protect americans just like her from the kind of insurance company abuses she had tone door. and i told her that it was because of her willingness to share her story and the extraordinary activism that she and people like her all across the country displayed, not just this year but over the last several years, that we are finally this close to getting reform done. their lives are what's at stake in this debate. and moments like this are why they sent us here, to finally meet the challenges that washington has put off for decades, to make their lives better and this nation stronger, to move america forward. that's what the house did last night when it brought us closer than we have ever been
me up. they should consider calling it a troop support tax. another facebook comment from katie, saying my family already paid our tax when my husband was in iraq for a year. if this tax means better armor for the vehicles, great. somehow i think the troops won't see any benefits from this. i got a text from star who says i've been taxed enough this year not to mention i now disagree with the war. and an e-mail from heather. if taxing the war helps bring down the deficit, that's great, but as a military family, we shouldn't be taxed. we've already sacrificed so much for the wars and paying taxes on our already low income wouldn't be fair. we've gotten comments similar to that one like heather's. and an e-mail from rod. the tax leveed for the war effort is perfect. i've waited years for this and similar measures. however, as is usual, a targeting mistake is being made by the politicians. the world needs to pay the tax to the united states for protecting their respective countries. we pay with our blood. they need to pay us for the past, the present, and all the future efforts. th
mccain staff -- that will be poor. the katie couric stuff gets people interested. now i have seen in the last 24 hours that john mccain people responding, wallace and greed because she says it is not true. you have this back and forth. she will get into that bus and get stuck talking about the past. host: will she run in 2012? guest: she may have may gamble to sell a lot of books and make money, but i do think she wants to? . there will be a lot of people telling her to run. guest: no. she got out of the governorship because of her family. she has levi over there and all that soap opera stuff. if she gets into it they will be right back into that. i think she would be very strong now. [laughter] she has a real, is very exciting. the washington press corps is obsess with her. i would stay with that. she can do a tremendous amount of good for the causes she believes in. but if she runs, if you go up there and do not wind -- like me, it is different afterwards. host: callehost: and who won? [laughter] guest: they are still counting. host: let's go to will head, ariz. chuck. caller: h
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)